Maria Miller, authenticity and the PR pitch

The resignation of Maria Miller, the former Culture Secretary who ‘stepped down’ over an expenses row a few days ago, just goes to show that saying sorry isn’t always enough.

While there are bigger issues in play regarding the structures and processes of policing MPs’ behaviour, there was much made of the ‘inadequate’ nature of Maria Miller’s apology to the House of Commons.

For many, her ‘32 second apology’ (as it’s pointedly dubbed in multiple news references) appeared hollow and insincere. The brevity of the apology – which was along the lines of ‘I’ve been asked to say this, so here I am’ – on the back of allegations that her attitude to the investigation had been unhelpful, left a poor impression. Did we believe that Ms Miller was sorry? Did her actions match her words?

Authenticity – as individuals, as business leaders, as brands and as organisations – is essential if we expect to be trusted by others.

What makes a voice authentic? I think it’s where our words and our behaviour are evidently in tune. It’s how we live our values in action, as individuals and as companies.

Authenticity matters for many reasons, not least because we all make emotional judgements about others; call it ‘gut feel’ or intuition, but it’s almost impossible to remove it from the way we make decisions.

Which brings me to PR pitches. I attended Adrian Wheeler’s thought provoking PRCA workshop the other day on ‘Pitching to Win Business’, and we discussed the subject of ‘chemistry’. Research among clients has shown that chemistry is in the top three most important factors when selecting an agency, alongside track record and creativity.

Adrian points out that this is hardly surprising, when you consider that personal relationships are essential to successful business relationships, although most procurement and pitch processes endeavour to be based on rational criteria and evidence.

He suggests that an explanation for this apparent conflict between the cold, hard, analytical process of choosing one agency over another, versus the ‘touchy feely’ sentiment of ‘I just like them’, may be found in Daniel Kahneman’s ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’. Kahneman describes two distinct ‘systems’ of how we think. System One is what we consider instinct, it’s subconscious, whereas System Two relates to our conscious thought process.

Kahneman’s research shows that nearly all our decisions are made quickly using System One, and we then use System Two to rationalise a decision we’ve already made, without being aware that this is what’s happening.

So, if it’s an emotional response that guides our thinking, then it follows that personal rapport, chemistry and authenticity are crucial; whether facing the Commons or a client pitch. Personally, I’ll stick to pitching.

Sarah Bryars

Chief Executive

Girl power!

It’s International Women’s Day tomorrow (8 March), which prompted my thinking into girl power; less Spice Girls, more women in PR.

Our industry of PR is actually dominated by women. Last year’s PRCA census revealed the gender split as 63% women 37% men, a stat that’s reflected in our team - with our chairman Colin holding the enviable (or unenviable position) as the only male member! Our current recruitment drive has echoed this discrepancy, with the majority of applicants applying for an account executive position being female.

So why this bias?  Is it because women are, on the whole, better communicators – as we are more discussion oriented?  Or is it thanks to our multi-tasking and time management skills?  Or is it because we are more sensitive? I’m not so sure. 

When I studied for a degree in PR (at Leeds Metropolitan University), admittedly it was a while ago, the course was mostly men.  And if I can cast my mind back that far, I don’t remember them struggling with presentations or meeting deadlines, and indeed most have now gone on to hold senior positions. 

Which rather annoyingly seems to be where the inequality lies – most senior roles within agencies and in-house teams are still more likely to be held by men.  The PRCA census reported a 2:1 ratio of men to women in board positions.  Our board contradicts this ratio, (although our most senior figure is male) but I can see that we are a minority, when I look at some of our clients or fellow agencies. 

Many would argue that the lack of female representation in senior management is partly due to the fact that women still tend to be the key child carers and take career breaks as they start to have children. As a result, they either leave the profession or aren’t able to make continued development.  I’m in no doubt that this can be a factor, but in today’s world it certainly shouldn’t be a barrier. 

Sadly, it’s not just inequality at senior levels either.  The CIPR’s ‘State of the Profession’  survey (published February 2014) also revealed an average gender pay gap of over £12,000 in favour of men.  The results also exposed that from Account Manager/Press Officer level and above – men, on average, are being paid more than women, even when doing the same job.

So, perhaps as an industry we should take note of Sweden’s extensive welfare system which makes it easier for both sexes to balance work and family life.  The country ranks as one of the most gender-egalitarian countries, based on a firm belief that men and women should share power and influence equally.  How refreshing!

Sam Kandiyali

Director

(Image used from http://www.internationalwomensday.com/) 

Clever communication is key to future success

At the heart of what all PRs do lies creativity, not only in terms of content but approach. Whether you’re writing an engaging press release or a short and snappy tweet, the aim of the game is to attract interest in your story and your client.

At a recent PRCA National Conference, executive director of government communications Alex Aiken said ‘the press release was dead’ during his speech on the future of PR. Aiken argues that this method of communicating with journalists, which dates back to the early 1900s, has become too ‘cosy’ for press officers, and they should be using multiple channels to distribute news.

He refers to a new era of communications, where press officers should be content creators; ‘You should not start with three pages of A4, but a tweet, an infographic or a video. If you are writing more than 200 words on any subject, you’re probably in the wrong place.’ But as PRs, are we not content generators by nature?

Before the invention of email and social media, PRs posted (in the traditional sense) press releases or issued them by fax machine. While the ways in which we present and distribute press information may have changed, we still use some form of ‘press release’, just perhaps not in its ‘traditional’ guise. A press release enables us to deliver information in a concise, engaging and factually correct manner; it has benefits especially when delivering sensitive information and when part of a clear strategy, it can be one of the most successful means of communication.

I think what Mr Aiken is discussing is a change in approach to communications rather than the literal sense of the press release being ‘dead’; what is dead is the traditional, fragmented process of just sending out a lengthy document. Communications should be issued in a way best suited to the individual/sector/audience you are trying to reach; whether that is a 140 character tweet, a cleverly placed direct mail campaign or a press release. Now more than ever it is about thinking outside the press release and developing strong media relationships, only then will PRs be able to determine the best way to reach the journalists.

I believe the press release is, and will remain, a classic form of communication. However, you can’t deny that communications is evolving; readers are receptive to broader information and far less detail, 140 characters rather than 600 words. The skill here is tailoring the content as well as the means by which it’s issued. I keep a personal media database where I note the quirks and interests of a journalist; rapport is just as important as a direct email address or mobile number.

With stringent budgets, PRs not only need to be innovative in the delivery of their communications but also consider cost-effective solutions for their clients. Social media does have its perks as it requires little ‘funding’ however what it does require is time and a good understanding of the platform you are using.

Yes, the rules of the game are changing, but press releases are still very much part of the communications mix. If your story is worth reading, it will be read. But what the press release should not do is supplement a good PR/journalist relationship.

Kalli Soteriou

Account Executive